Monday, February 12, 2007

More on the affidavit's results

Last Friday, Feb. 9, Beth Brewer, a Durham resident who led the campaign to unseat DA Mike Nifong in last November’s election, filed a sworn affidavit in Durham Superior Court requesting the court remove Nifong from office. The affidavit cited as cause for removal many of Nifong’s statements and actions which the NC State Bar’s Ethics Committee cited when it brought charges against him.

I posted Saturday on Brewer’s action and the news a judge would stay her request at least until the Bar acts on its Ethics Committee’s charges. Even if the judge stays her request, Brewer’s action accomplished a great deal. I discussed some of what it accomplished.

Today, in this post, I'll say more about what Brewer's filing accomplished.

A WRAL report on the filing included the following:

The complaint is significant, former federal prosecutor Dan Boyce said, and raises questions not only about Nifong's ability to serve as district attorney, but also his right to practice law.

"I think he's got to consider whether, in the interest of justice and in fairness to the people of Durham County, whether it's time to resign," Boyce said. "There's too much attention being focused on him and not enough attention being focused on the (Duke lacrosse) case itself."
As noted in Saturday’s post, Boyce ran in 2000 as the Republican candidate for NC Attorney General, losing to the present Attorney General, Roy Cooper.

Boyce is, as far as I know, the first state-wide leader of either party to call on Nifong to resign.

Boyce’s call for Nifong’s resignation, coming as it does from a very well-respected former federal prosecutor, state attorney general candidate and member of the NC Bar should prompt reporters to ask other NC leaders whether they agree Nifong should resign.

Governor Mike Easley, now in his seventh year as governor, recently said Nifong was his worst gubernatorial appointment.

Well, Governor, do you agree with Boyce? Should your worst appointee resign?

Members of both parties now seeking their party’s nominations for state-wide offices – particularly governor and attorney general – should be asked by media whether they too think Nifong should resign.

Law professors and leading attorneys should be asked for their opinion on resignation.

By prompting Boyce’s resignation call, Brewer’s filing has helped make it easy for NC’s media to ask the Nifong resignation question when news reporting and to comment on it when editorializing.

If editorialists don't think Nifong should resign, what do they think a district attorney charged by the State Bar’s Ethics Committee with scores of ethics violations including withholding exculpatory evidence should do during the months he’s preparing his defense and a cloud hangs over his office?

Should Nifong perhaps take a leave of absence? Are there provisions in state law for the appointment of a temporary replacement? What about that, Governor Easley?

Or should we just go on for months in Durham with a situation in which, if a police officer, for example, is trying to get a witness or suspect to cooperate in a criminal investigation, the officer is forced to say something like: “Why, yes, our DA had been charged with withholding exculpatory evidence. Does that bother you?”

An awful lot of good has already come from the affidavit filing. And a lot more good can come of it.

Once more to Beth Brewer and those working with her: Well done and thank you.

7 comments:

Anonymous said...

Can the Gov really ask Nifong to resign? Not, can he form the words, but does he have any statutory authority to back up the request?

I'd be curious to know if an NC gov has ever intervened like that....

-AC

Anonymous said...

Nifong is a train wreck for the whole Durham justice system. Nobody can really deal with him, because they don't know if he'll even be around to back up his deals...or for that matter, if he even has the ethics to keep to a promise to do so.

Anonymous said...

Here are a couple of fantasies that are fun to play with.

Plagiarized from a Mae West movie, I think.

Judge Hudson to Beth Brewer -

Judge Hudson: Ms. Brewer, are you showing contempt for this court?

Ms Brewer: No, you Honor, I am doing my best to hide it.

*************

Here's another fun one.

Defense counsel in unrelated rape case to Durham ADA.

Defense: Have you or anyone in your office ever withheld or conspired to withhold exculpatory evidence in a rape case?

ADA: Objection!

Judge Hudson: Sustained. Counsel will refrain from asking relevant questions!

Mike in Nevada

Anonymous said...

Thanks John

Nice to see the fine results of Beth's actions pointed out.

Where would Durham be going without Beth?

Anonymous said...

Account of the "Shut Up and Teach Forum"

http://z9.invisionfree.com/LieStoppers_Board/index.php?showtopic=2088&view=findpost&p=7926688

Anonymous said...

Actually, the best leave of absence that Liefong can take is that leave to take up residence in the crowbar motel. Nothing less will suffice. This man is a criminal, period. He pushed an illegal investigation, broke the law on many occasions, obstructed justice, and lied to the courts.

Furthermore, he tried to railroad three young men into prison for 60 years for something that he knew never took place. That is why I say that prison is the only remedy that will suffice for Michael B. Liefong.

Anonymous said...

A car amplifier will give you a loud and clear sound on a consistent basis. It will boost the power flowing from the

receiver to the speakers. In doing so, it will reduce the stress put on all the other components of your car stereo

system, including the receiver.

Choosing the right car amplifier is important. Your decision should be based on five important features. Make sure

you address them all !

The first item on the agenda is the number of channels. This will depend on the number of speakers in your system.

Two-channel amplifiers will feed well two speakers or a single subwoofer. You will want to consider a four-channel

amplifier if you have any of the following combinations :